Table 1 demonstrates the descriptive results with reliability indices. Although several scales have significantly correlated, they all have weak associations. The model had acceptable fit (CFI = 0.941, TLI = 0.928, RMSEA = 0.043, [90% CI = 0.0380.048]). The strongest predictor of problematic Tinder use was self-esteem enhancement motivation (? = 0.37, p < .001).>
Table 1.
The mediational model of personality traits, Tinder-use motivations and problematic Tinder use (Study 2). Note. All variables presented in ellipses are latent variables. For the sake of clarity, indicator variables related to latent variables and correlations between the variables were not depicted in this figure. One-headed arrows represent standardized regression weights. The non-significant pathways were not depicted on the figure for the sake of simplicity; *p < .05.>
Earlier in the day education advertised strong contacts anywhere between reasonable mind-regard and you can problematic online practices as pages want to boost its self-regard in the form of brand new digital ecosystem (age.g., Armstrong ainsi que al., 2000; Yang & Tung, 2007).